December 10, 2007
Capsule Summary--This Week:
Continuing Resolution expires this
Friday.
On Tuesday, the House will attempt to move an
omnibus appropriations bill that splits
the $23 billion difference between
Congress' 2008 discretionary funding levels
and the President's requested levels.
However, on Saturday, the White
House issued a statement by OMB Director Jim
Nussle reiterating the Administration veto
threat.
On war funding, it remains unclear how
the impasse on the President's $196 billion
2008 war funding request can be resolved,
given Democratic opposition to funding
without a timetable, and the strong
opposition of the President and Senate
Republicans to funding with any strings
attached.
House Democrats will try again to move an
AMT patch with offsetting revenue
raisers. Senate Republicans continue to
strongly oppose enacting revenue raisers to
pay for the cost of the patch, and Senate
Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT)
has adopted that position.
The President is expected to veto revised
legislation to extend and expand the
coverage of State Children's Health Insurance
(SCHIP). A House vote to override is
expected to fail, and Congress is instead
likely to pass a one-year extension of the
program, with sufficient funds to cover
increasing health care costs--but not to
increase enrollment.
Senate continues debate on the Farm
Bill this week. With 40 amendments
allowed, and no germaneness restrictions,
completing action this session is a tall
order.
Senate negotiations continue on the
House-passed energy bill which
establishes tax incentives for hybrids and
alternative fuels and pays for it by rolling
back oil and gas industry tax preferences.
House and Senate are expected to pass the FY
2008 Defense authorization conference
report this week. The measure does not
include a withdrawal timetable or other
restrictions.
Senate Finance and House Ways & Means
negotiators meet this week in search of
agreement on a measure to postpone a
scheduled 10 percent cut in Medicare
physician payments.
Looking Ahead: House and Senate will
reconvene for the second session on
Tuesday, January 15. The President will
deliver the State of the Union Address
on January 22, 2008.
House-Passed Energy Bill Faces Delay in Senate
Last week the House passed a sweeping
energy bill
(HR 6) including provisions that would
establish $22 billion in tax
incentives for hybrid vehicles and
production of alternative fuels, and pay for
the incentives by rolling back $13 billion in
tax breaks for oil and gas companies. The
bill would also increase fuel economy
standards to 35 miles per gallon by 2020, and
require utilities to generate 15% of their
electricity from renewable sources. The
Administration has threatened
to veto the bill and Senate Republicans
oppose the rollback in oil and gas tax
preferences, as well as the renewable
electricity mandate.
Appropriations: Impasse on Spending Levels and War Funding
Congress and the President are mired in the
most contentious budget battle since
1995. Two months into the fiscal year,
only 1 of the 12 FY 2008 appropriations bills
(Defense non-war spending) has been enacted.
The Federal Government is currently operating
under a continuing resolution (included
in HR 3222) allowing programs to operate
at FY 2007 spending levels through December
14. Two fundamental issues divide Congress
and the Administration: spending
levels and funding for the war
in Iraq.
1. Logjam on Spending Levels:
President Bush has threatened to veto 7 of
the 12 FY 2008 Appropriations Bills due to
spending levels that exceed his requests by
$23 billion; and has issued 2 additional veto
threats on policy grounds [summarized below].
If congressional Republicans
continue to support the President's
no-negotiation stance on spending levels,
this session could end with a reprise of last
February's 2007 funding resolution that
generally continued funding at the prior
year's levels, with some programs getting
hikes, and others being cut.
2. Impasse on War Funding:
Although the regular FY 2008 Defense
Appropriations bill has been enacted (HR
3222), Democrats and Republicans have not
yet reached agreement on war funding
for the new fiscal year. The President has
requested $196 billion in total war funding
for FY 2008. The House passed a $50 billion
partial war funding bill in November, but
tied it to an Iraq withdrawal
timetable--which ran into a Senate
Republican filibuster.
House Democratic leaders are
reportedly planning to include in this week's
omnibus appropriations bill, war funding for
Afghanistan but not Iraq due to strong
opposition among House war opponents. The
Senate may then amend the bill to include
funding for both military operations--following which
the House would have to vote on the Senate
amendment.
Background--appropriations bills the
President has threatened to veto due to
funding levels:
1. Agriculture/HR
3161: House bill $982 million over
President's request; Senate-reported bill
$874 million over President's request; White
House threatened
a veto on July 31. House
Summary Senate
Summary
2. Commerce-Justice-Science/HR
3093: House bill $2.31 billion over
President's request; Senate bill $4.2 billion
over President's request; White House has threatened
to veto the House and Senate
bills.
House
Summary Senate
Summary
3. Energy-Water/HR
2641: House bill $1.13 billion over
President's request; Senate-reported bill
$800 million over President's request; White
House threatened
a veto on June 13. House
Summary Senate
Summary
4. Homeland Security/HR
2638: House bill $2.06 billion over
President's request; Senate bill $5.25
billion over President's request; White House
has threatened
to veto the House and Senate
bills. House
Summary Senate
Summary
5. Interior-Environment/HR
2643: House bill $1.95 billion over
President's request; Senate-reported bill
$1.498 billion over President's request;
White House threatened
a veto on June 25. House
Summary Senate
Summary
6. Labor-HHS-Education/HR
3043: On November 13, the President
vetoed
the Conference Report, which would have
appropriated $9.8 billion more than the
President's request. On November 15, the
House failed to override the President's veto
277-141, two votes short of the necessary
two-thirds. Conference
Report Summary
7. Transportation-HUD/HR
3074: Conference Report is $3
billion above the President's request and
includes an additional $195 million in
emergency funds for rebuilding the I-35W
bridge in Minneapolis. The Administration
has threatened to veto the
conference bill. Conference
Report Summary
The President has also threatened to
veto the Financial Services and
State-Foreign Ops appropriations bills
on policy grounds:
Financial Services/HR
2829: House bill $244 million under
President's request; Senate-reported bill
$122 million over President's request; White
House threatened
a veto on June 26 because of provisions
that would "weaken current [trade]
restrictions against Cuba." House
Summary Senate
Summary
State-Foreign Ops/HR
2764: House bill $700 million under
President's request; Senate bill $720 million
under President's request; White House has threatened
to veto the House and Senate
bills; both bills face veto threats because
of language that would overturn a policy
barring U.S. funding for any international
organization that performs abortions overseas
(even if U.S. funds are not used for
abortions). House
Summary Senate
Summary
The President has called for offsets to
pay for the Mil Con-VA Bill/HR
2642: While the conference report
is $4 billion over the President's request,
the White House has not threatened a veto but
is instead calling
for offsets in other spending bills.
Conference
Report Summary
Senate Passes AMT Patch Without Offsets
House Democrats will make another attempt
this week to bring to the Floor an AMT
patch with offsetting revenue raisers,
including $24 billion from new limits on the
ability of hedge fund managers to defer
offshore compensation, and $25 billion from
delaying new interest expense allocation
rules that benefit multinational
corporations. (Rangel
Release)
Last Thursday, December 6, the Senate voted
88-5
to pass an AMT patch, but without
offsets to pay for the patch and
without tax extenders. (H.R.
3996) The offsets and extenders
included in the House bill were dropped by a
Baucus
amendment, after a cloture motion on the
House bill failed by a vote of 46-48.
The 32 "extenders" dropped from the
bill included extension of the R&D tax credit
and deductibility of State and local sales
taxes. In addition, the House bill also
included $4 billion to expand the child
credit and increase the standard
deduction. (JCT
explanation of provisions)
The President had threatened
to veto the House bill over the revenue
raisers, as well as provisions that would
repeal the IRS's authorization to use private
debt collectors.
The Treasury Department projects that the
number of taxpayers subject to the AMT in
2007 will jump from 4 million to 25
million without enactment of a one-year
patch. (Treasury
Statement)
PAYGO Offsets: The AMT/extenders
legislation presents a major problem for
Democrats who trumpeted the importance of
reestablishing PAYGO rules last January.
House Democrats remain committed to passing
the AMT patch with offsets, refusing to waive
PAYGO rules. (Blue
Dog Statement) Last month's House vote,
however, exposed divisions in the party, with
some Democrats siding with the Republicans.
Congressional Republicans have renewed
calls for patching the AMT without
offsets. (Boehner
Release)
[Context on AMT: The AMT was enacted
in 1969 to preclude very wealthy individuals
from escaping all tax liability due to tax
loopholes. It operates as an alternative
calculation of income tax liability which
cancels out various deductions, exclusions,
and tax preferences. Taxpayers are required
to pay the higher of AMT tax liability and
regular income tax liability. However,
upper-middle and middle-income taxpayers are
increasingly finding themselves subject to
the AMT for two reasons. First, while the
regular income tax is indexed for inflation,
the AMT is not. Second, recent income tax
rate reductions have narrowed the differences
between regular and AMT tax liabilities.]
SCHIP to be extended, but not expanded
With Congress and the President at an impasse
on legislation to expand State
Children's Health Insurance (SCHIP) funding,
Congress is instead likely to pass a one-year
extension of the program, with sufficient
funds to cover increasing health care costs
for current recipients--but not to increase
enrollment.
On November 1, the Senate passed a
revised SCHIP bill (H.R.
3963) by a vote of 64-30
which the President is expected to veto this
week. (CBO
Cost Estimate) The revised bill has not
attracted the votes needed to reach a 2/3
veto-proof majority in the House.
[Context: The congressional SCHIP
bill would reauthorize the program and
increase Federal funding by $35
billion over 5 years ($30 billion more
than the President's request) in order to
boost covered children from 6 million to 10
million. SCHIP was established in 1997 and
provides health coverage to children in
families whose incomes are low, but somewhat
higher than Medicaid's very tight income
eligibility limits. The program operates
similar to Medicaid with Federal
reimbursements for a percentage of State
expenditures to provide health coverage for
eligible children.]
Farm Bill Debate Resumes in Senate
Debate will resume on the Farm Bill this week
after the Senate leadership reached a
compromise on the number of amendments to be
debated. Last month, the Senate began debate
on the multiyear Farm Bill (HR
2419), which quickly descended into a
procedural quagmire over an attempt to limit
amendments to "relevant" items, to which
Republicans objected.
The compromise allows for 40 amendments,
split evenly between Democrats and
Republicans, with no restriction on subject
matter of the amendments.
The White House has issued a Statement of
Administration Policy threatening
to veto the bill, criticizing the
legislation for using budgetary "gimmicks" to
comply with Senate PAYGO rules.
Delaying the Farm Bill to next session would
pose new challenges for farm advocates
because rising commodity prices will lower
the "baseline," i.e., the budgetary starting
point for assembling new farm legislation.
(In short, waiting until next year could
boost the amount of offsets needed to pay for
the farm bill.)
[Context: The "Farm Bill," renewed
every 5 to 6 years, governs the key aspects
of Federal farm policy. Many provisions of
the current Farm Bill, enacted in 2002,
expired this year. The 2002 bill covers a
wide range of programs. Those with the
greatest budget impact are (1) Food Stamps;
(2) Commodity Support programs (government
subsidies to producers of certain farm
commodities--primarily corn, cotton, wheat,
rice, and soybeans--intended to stabilize
farm income); (3) Agricultural Conservation
programs (payments and incentives addressing
environmental concerns, soil erosion and
water supplies); and (4) Export promotion
programs.]
Senate
Agriculture Committee Summary
CBO
Cost Estimate
CRS
Report: Crop Insurance and Disaster
Assistance: 2007 Farm Bill Issues
Recent Budget-Related Docs
CRS: The
Cost of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Other Global
War on Terror Operations Since 9/11: "The
Administration has requested an additional
$195 billion for war-related activities for
DOD, State/AID and Department of Veterans'
Affairs (VA) Medical in FY2008 in regular and
emergency requests including amendments
submitted on July 31, 2007 for Mine Resistant
Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles and the
additional funds requested October 22, 2007.
Of that $195 billion, Iraq would receive
about $158 billion and Afghanistan about $37
billion according to CRS estimates. If
Congress provides these funds, CRS estimates
that Iraq would receive $607 billion and
Afghanistan about $164 billion since the 9/11
attacks."
CRS: FY2008 SCHIP Allotments: "The
President vetoed legislation (H.R. 976) and
is expected to veto more recently passed
legislation (H.R. 3963) that would provide
new federal funding for the State Children's
Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) in FY2008
through FY2012. In lieu of SCHIP
reauthorization, continuing resolutions (P.L.
110-92 and P.L. 110-116) contain temporary
FY2008 appropriations for SCHIP allotments.
These extensions appropriated to SCHIP the
same amount for FY2008 that was appropriated
for FY2007 ($5 billion), with the current-law
formula used to allot these funds among the
states and territories. The most recently
enacted continuing resolution makes the
FY2008 allotments available only through
December 14, 2007. The FY2008 allotments can
be available past December 14 only if new
legislation is enacted. Based on states'
projections, if the current FY2008 allotments
were available through the end of FY2008, 21
states would exhaust all available federal
SCHIP funds during the fiscal year, with the
first states experiencing shortfalls in March
2008. This report provides projections of
those states' shortfalls, as well as
projections of states' FY2008 allotments as
would occur under the H.R. 976 and H.R. 3963,
which is identical to H.R. 976 in terms of
the appropriations and formulas for SCHIP
allotments."
Excerpted from CRS Report No. RS22739.
CBO: The
Impact of Unauthorized Immigrants on the
Budgets of State and Local Governments
CBO: Monthly
Budget Review
GAO: Rental
Housing: Information on Low-Income Veterans'
Housing Conditions and Participation in HUD's
Programs
|