Tax Tracker
Economic Stimulus | Incentives for Renewable Fuels | Tax Extenders | Alternative Minimum Tax Relief | Reform the Estate Tax | Small Business Tax Relief | Technical Corrections | Pension Technical Corrections | Internet Tax Moratorium | Mortgage Relief Act | Extend the Tax Cuts | Close the Tax Gap | Depletion of the Highway Trust Fund |
Tax Issues in the 110th Congress
CRS Report: The Flat Tax, Value-Added Tax, and National Retail Sales Tax: Overview of the Issues (March 14, 2008)
CRS Report: Tax Reform--An Overview of Proposals in the 110th Congress (Feb. 15, 2008)
CRS Report: Major Tax Issues in the 110 th Congress
CRS Report: Business Tax Issues in the 110 th Congress
JCT Overview of the Federal Tax System as in effect for 2007
CBO Budget Options Book – February 2007 (See “Revenue Options”)
Economic
Stimulus (2008) |
Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 |
| House Committee |
Jan 17, 2008: Bernanke Testimony at House Budget Committee
Jan 29, 2008: House Budget Committee hearing testimony on Economic Stimulus
|
| House Floor |
Jan 28, 2008: HR 5140 Introduced in the House
Jan 28, 2008: JCT revenue estimate: House Bill
Jan 29, 2008: HR 5140 Passed 385-35
Feb 7, 2008: House agreed to the Senate amendment 380-34
|
| Senate Committee |
Jan 30, 3008: Finance Committee press releases on committee bill
Jan 30, 2008: Floor Statement of Chairman Baucus
Jan 30, 2008: JCT revenue estimate: Senate Finance Committee reported bill |
| Senate Floor |
Feb 7, 2008: Senate passes HR 5140 with an amendment (seniors and veterans) by a vote of 81-16 |
| Conference Committee |
No conference; resolved as amendment between the houses |
| JCT publications |
Feb 13, 2008: Overview of Past Stimulus Legislation
Feb 8, 2008: Distributional Effects Economic Stimulus Act of 2008
Feb 8, 2008: Revenue Effects of the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008
Feb 8, 2008: Technical Explanation of the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008
|
| Presidential Action |
Feb 13, 2008: Signed by President. Became Public Law 110-85. |
Incentives for
Renewable
Fuels
HR 5351 (2008) |
Last year, Congress passed landmark energy legislation (PL 110-140) increasing fuel efficiency requirements for automobiles. However,
overcoming a filibuster in the Senate required Democrats to drop other
provisions calling for a renewable energy mandate on utilities, as well
as extension of tax incentives for wind and solar power (expiring in
2008), paid for by rolling back existing petroleum tax preferences.
These provisions were reintroduced in 2008 as HR 5351. |
| House Committee |
Feb 12, 2008: Chairman Rangel introduces HR 5351 (referred to Ways and Means) |
| House Floor |
Feb 27, 2008: Passed House 236-182 |
| Senate Committee |
Feb 28, 2008: Referred to Senate Finance Committee |
| Senate Floor |
. |
| Conference Committee |
|
| JCT Publications |
Estimated revenue effects of HR 5351
Technical Explanation of HR 5351
|
| Presidential Action |
|
| Tax "Extenders" |
|
| House Committee |
The House Ways and Means Committee passed HR 6049, a $54 billion tax extenders and energy incentives bill. Over 10 years, the bill spends about $27 billion on provisions to extend dozens of expired (and expiring) tax provisions. The bill also includes nearly $17 billion in energy tax incentives and about $10 billion in additional tax relief. The bill passed 25-12.JCT Revenue Estimate (summarizes the bill)
JCT Description (detailed description of provisions) |
| House Floor |
|
| Senate Committee |
Senator Baucus introduced a draft "tax extenders" bill, S. 2886, on April 17th.
For a complete list of items under consideration, see the CRS Summary of S. 2886.
On the issue of offsets, 41 Republican Senators (the
number needed to successfully filibuster legislation) have signed a
letter opposing the use of any offsets for extenders or AMT relief. Text of the Senate Letter |
| Senate Floor |
|
| Conference Committee |
|
| Final Congressional Action |
|
| Presidential Action |
|
| AMT Relief (2007) |
Relief from the Alternative Minimum Tax was scheduled to expire with tax year 2006. Background--In
1969, after Congress learned that taxpayers with incomes above
$200,000 had paid no 1966 Federal tax, lawmakers enacted the AMT in
order to ensure that everyone pays a minimum amount of tax, regardless
of how many tax preferences or deductions they may technically be
entitled to. In general, the AMT operates by requiring people to
recalculate their taxes under alternative rules that (1) include certain forms of income exempt from regular tax and (2) disallow certain exemptions, deductions, and preferences.
Upper-middle and middle-income taxpayers are
increasingly finding themselves subject to the AMT for two reasons.
First, while the regular income tax is indexed for inflation, the AMT
is not. Second, recent income tax rate reductions have narrowed the
differences between regular and AMT tax liabilities.
According to CBO, until 2000, less than 1% of
taxpayers paid AMT in any year. In 2001, 2003, and 2006, Congress
enacted temporary increases in the AMT exemption amounts in order to mitigate the AMT’s increasing impact on middle-income
taxpayers. However, if AMT relief had not been extended beyond 2006,
in 2007 24 million taxpayers would have been subject to the AMT.
The most contentious issue during consideration of the
AMT patch was whether to follow the new PAYGO rules and offset the
bill's costs.
JCT Background on the AMT
CRS Report: Modifying the AMT
CRS Report: The Alternative Minimum Tax for Individuals: Legislative Initiatives in the 110th Congress
CBO article on AMT in Budget and Economic Outlook, see pages 88-89 |
| House Committee |
Nov 6, 2007: HR 3996 reported by Committee on Ways and Means. H.Rept. 110-431 |
| House Floor |
Nov. 9, 2007: House passes HR 2996 by a vote of 216-193
|
| Senate Floor |
Dec 6, 2007: Senate passes AMT patch but strips out the House offsets, 88-5. (HR 3996)
Conrad Statement on Waiving PAYGO |
| Final Congressional Action |
Dec. 19, 2007: House passes one-year AMT Patch, as amended by the Senate, without offsets, 352-64. (HR 3996) |
| Presidential Action |
Dec. 26, 2007: President signs HR 3996, PL 110-196 |
Reform the
Estate Tax |
The
estate and gift tax is a high-profile public policy issue that is
widely misunderstood. The estate and gift tax is a minor slice of
the revenue pie, accounting for only 1% of Federal revenues. Because of
the estate and gift tax “exemption,” as well as various deductions,
the tax impacts only a tiny percentage of Americans. For example, only
2% of all deaths in the United States. in tax year 2001 resulted in
estate tax liability; in 2008, only 0.5% of estates are taxed, due to
the increasing exemption.
The estate tax is applied when property is transferred at death. After deductions and exemptions, the remaining amount is subject to graduated rates of taxation up to
45% as estate size increases. An unlimited marital deduction is allowed
for property transferred to a surviving spouse. Other allowable
deductions include charitable contributions and estate administration
expenses. In addition, the so-called unified credit exempts the
first $2 million of an estate from tax. This is the primary reason why
the estate tax impacts only a tiny fraction of the estates in the
nation. Under current law, the $2 million exemption will increase to
$3.5 million in 2009, and the estate tax will be fully repealed in
2010, but then bounces back in 2011.
The Federal gift tax operates in conjunction with
the estate tax to prevent people from shielding their property from
estate taxes by making gifts to heirs prior to death. Each year
individuals can make gifts of $12,000 to as many individual recipients
as they wish, without being subject to the gift tax. However, any
amount in excess of this per-person gift limit is applied to a lifetime
gift exclusion amount of $1 million. At time of death, the cumulative
amount of gift tax exclusion used by the decedent reduces the estate
tax exemption. In this way, the gift tax operates in a unified manner
with the estate tax.
CRS: Economic Issues Surrounding the Estate and Gift Tax
CRS: Estate and Gift Taxes--Economic Issues
CRS: Asset Distribution of Taxable Estates |
| House Committee |
|
| House Floor |
. |
| Senate Committee |
|
| Senate Floor |
. |
| Conference Committee |
|
| Final Congressional Action |
|
| Presidential Action |
|
Small Business
Tax Relief (2007) |
Deficit neutral $4.8 billion small business tax relief package to accompany the minimum wage increase.
In February, both the House and Senate approved bills
containing small business tax benefits (an amended version of HR 2 in
the Senate and HR 976 in the House), then in mid-March folded the tax
provisions into their respective versions of HR 1591, the FY 07
Supplemental Appropriations Bill. Congress passed a conference report
but the President vetoed the due to Iraq-related provisions. On May 24,
the House and Senate approved a modified supplemental, containing the
same tax provisions and the President signed the bill on May 25, 2007. |
| House Committee |
Feb 13, 2007: CBO Cost Estimate of HR 976 as reported |
| House Floor |
Feb 26, 2007: Summary of HR 976 (House-passed) providing $1.3 billion of small business tax relief |
| Senate Committee |
Jan 23 2007: CBO Cost Estimate of HR 2 as reported by Senate Finance |
| Senate Floor |
Feb 1, 2007: Summary of HR 2 (Senate-passed) minimum wage legislation, with $12.6 billion of tax relief
April 4, 2007: JCT estimates of tax provisions in Senate-passed War Supplemental
|
| Conference Committee |
April 23, 2007: Summary of Small Business Tax Relief Package included in War Supplemental, H.R. 1591
April 24, 2007: JCT explanation of Small Business Tax Relief Provisions in H.R. 1591
|
| Final Congressional Action |
|
| Presidential Action |
May 1, 2007: President vetoes H.R. 1591
May 25, 2007: President signs H.R. 2206, PL 110-28 (tax provisions are identical to the vetoed bill) |
Pension
Technical Corrections |
- Pension Protection Technical Corrections Act of 2007 (S. 1974) -
Amends the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the
Internal Revenue Code, as amended by the Pension Protection Act of
2006, to make changes regarding defined benefit pension plans.
|
| House Committee |
|
| House Floor |
|
| Senate Committee |
Aug 3, 2007: S. 1974 introduced and placed on the Senate Calendar |
| Senate Floor |
Dec 19, 2007: S. 1974 passed Senate, with an amendment, by unanimous consent |
| Conference Committee |
|
| Final Congressional Action |
|
| Presidential Action |
|
Internet Tax
Moratorium (2007) |
H.R. 3678: The Internet Tax Moratorium Act "extends the moratorium on
State and local government Internet access taxes and multiple and
discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce for seven years, through
Novemeber 1, 2014." (Administration Statement) |
| House Committee |
September 9, 2007 : H.R. 3678 introduced in the House. |
| House Floor |
October 16, 2007: H.R. 3678 passed in the House, 405-2. |
| Senate Committee |
|
| Senate Floor |
October 25, 2007 : H.R. 3678 passed Senate, with an amendment, by unanimous consent. |
| Conference Committee |
|
| Final Congressional Action |
|
| Presidential Action |
October 31, 2007 : President signed H.R. 3678, Extension of Internet Tax Moratorium (CBO Cost Estimate) |
Mortgage Relief
Act (2007) |
- Creates "
a three-year window for homeowners to refinance
their mortgage and pay no taxes on any debt forgiveness that they
receive."
(Fact Sheet)
|
| House Committee |
Oct 1, 2007: Reported by Committee on Ways and Means. H.Rpt. 110-356. |
| House Floor |
Oct 4, 1007: Passed by House 386-27. |
| Senate Committee |
Dec 14, 2007: Senate Finance Committee discharged by unanimous consent |
| Senate Floor |
Dec 14, 2007: Passed Senate by unanimous consent |
| Conference Committee |
|
| Final Congressional Action |
|
| Presidential Action |
Dec 20, 2007: President signed the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 (PL 110-142). |
|
"America's Priorities
and
Election 2008"
Need a speaker for your
next conference?
Contact us at
703-351-5048
A customized seminar
for your staff on the
Federal budget?
speakers@
washingtonbudgetreport.com
To advertise or place
a sponsored link,
contact us at
703-351-5048
|
OTHER
TAX ISSUES |
|
| Extend the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts |
In
2001, tax rates were reduced from 15, 28. 31, and 39.6 percent to 10,
15, 25, 31, and 35 percent--with the rate reductions scheduled to expire
in 2010. The tax cuts also called for estate tax exemptions to increase
through 2009, elimination of the estate tax in 2010, and a bounce back
to the 2001 estate tax rates in 2011. The President's FY 2008 Budget
called for permanent extension of the lower tax rates, as well as
extension of the increased child credit and marriage penalty relief, at a
10-year cost of $1 trillion. The President's Budget also called for
permanent elimination of the the estate tax, at a 10-year cost of $500
billion. The Congressional Budget Resolution for FY 2008 accommodated
extension of "middle class tax relief" including marriage penalty
relief, child credit extension, and the 10 percent bracket, and estate
tax relief that would set permanent estate tax levels at the 2009 level
(i.e. 45% rate and $3.5 million exemption). However, this extension of
tax relief was made contingent on identifying PAYGO offsets to pay for
the projected revenue losses, as well as a statutory trigger allowing
the cuts to take effect only if OMB and Treasury certify that budget
surpluses materialize. Subsequent to adoption of the Budget Resolution
there was no serious action to identify offsets to pay for tax relief
beyond 2010.
CRS: Expiration of the Cuts
|
Close the Tax Gap
|
Closing
the "Tax Gap," that is, the difference between taxes owed and taxes
paid has periodically been offered as a means of "paying for" proposed
changes in the Tax Code. The most recent estimates of the Tax Gap place
the shortfall at $345 billion--$290 billion after collection actions.
5/22/07:
Senate Budget Committee states that the FY 2008 Budget Resolution's
higher revenue levels, as compared with the President's Budget “can be
attained by closing the tax gap, shutting down abusive tax shelters,
addressing offshore tax havens…”
4/19/07: GAO Reports to Senate Finance Committee on Tax Gap
4/19/07: GAO: Thousands of Federal Contractors Abuse the Federal Tax System
02/16/07: GAO: Multiple Approaches are Needed to Reduce the Tax Gap
IRS Oversight Board Report on the Tax Gap
IRS: Understanding the Tax Gap
Treasury/OTP: A Comprehensive Strategy for Reducing the Tax Gap
JCT Report on Options to Improve Tax Compliance
CRS Report on the Tax Gap and Tax Enforcement
CRS Report: Tax Gap--Proposals in the 110th Congress to Require Brokers to Report Basis on Publicly Traded Securities |
Depletion of the
Highway Trust Fund |
March
27, 2007: CBO Testimony: “If annual obligation limits are set at the
levels authorized in 2005, CBO projects that the highway account of the
Highway Trust Fund will become exhausted at some point during fiscal
year 2009.” |
109th Congress
JCT Explanation of Tax Legislation Enacted in the 109 th Congress
|